Wednesday, November 30, 2016

SA 21- B Africa, Chan, Garcia, Macatulad, Trinidad, Yu

1.      What norm did you violate?
-          Proper etiquette while eating in public (e.g., way of eating, way of sitting, behavior inside the restaurant)

2.      Describe the breaching experiment in detail? What was the activity? Where did you do it?
-          Where: Kenny Rogers (to focus on the reactions of people in the middle to upper classes), and Jollibee (to focus on the reactions of people in the lower to middle class)
-          Activity: Deviance to “proper” eating etiquette
-          Did not sit properly (1 chair - backwards, 1 chair - sideways)
-          Used our hands while eating
-          Did not use a spoon while eating ice cream and drank directly from the cup
-          Ordered food or asked for something in the counter while holding the whole plate and eating
-          Walked around the restaurant while holding the whole plate and eating

3.      What were the different reactions of the people? List all possible reactions you observed. Why do you think they reacted this way? What caused these reactions? Did the deviant act re-affirm/reinforce the existing norms based on these reactions?
-          Kenny Rogers
-          Reactions:
-          When I first turned my chair backwards, people beside me reacted differently. People stared at me, probably wondering why I did it.
-          While eating with my hands, the waitress in the cafe smiled and laughed at me.
-          When I walk around while eating, a waiter approached me. They thought that I was having problems with my dish.
-          Then, for the second time, another waiter approached me. He was collecting my plate.
-          Insights:
-          The staff and customers of Kenny Rogers probably reacted this way because they hold proper eating etiquette with high regard. This includes eating with utensils, sitting down properly, and etc.
-          They view this as a social norm, and people who sway from this are regarded as deviants and are judged appropriately.
-          Jollibee
-          Reactions:
-          Customers were indifferent when we ate using our hands and our chairs turned backwards.
-          The waiters even offered tissue.
-          Insights:
-          The staff and customers of Jollibee probably reacted this way because they were used to this kind of behavior.
-          Another reason could be that they honestly did not care.
-          They do not hold much importance to “proper” eating etiquette and do not regard them as a social norm.
-          The familial/kiddy vibe of Jollibee probably also contributed to the fact that our behavior came across as something they are used to (because kids are there all the time).

4.      Aside from the norms, what sociological themes are at play for people to react in a certain way? Is it a function of gender, social class, values/beliefs of institutions?
-          Other sociological themes at play were social class expectations.
-          We conducted the experiment in Kenny Rogers and Jollibee precisely to see the difference in social class expectations.
-          Kenny Rogers, being a more high-end restaurant than Jollibee, expects a sense of “class” from its customers.
-          Also, customers eating in Kenny Rogers expect to interact with people from the same social class with the same social graces and etiquette.
-          To do the simple act of turning one’s chair backwards in a more high-end restaurant definitely turns heads.
-          Furthermore, the staff in Kenny Rogers normally deal with middle to high class customers and have certain expectations on how they must act, hence the reaction of the waiters.
-          Jollibee, on the other hand, caters to low to middle class customers, which comprise the bulk of the population.
-          Customers expect few or no social eating etiquette, hence their indifference.
-          In turn, the Jollibee staff does not expect any form of eating etiquette from their customers.
-          In summary, the different social class expectations in the two restaurants drive people’s reactions towards social deviance.

5.      How did you feel when you did this experiment? How does it feel to deviate from the norms? Were you hesitant to do the activity?
-          It was embarrassing since people were looking at you
-          It was also embarrassing to deviate from the norms because you know that people will judge you
-          Hesitant at first because the activity we’re going to do is not normal like you know that some people will look at you and judge you because that’s not the proper way of behaving in a restaurant
-          Even though people do not notice that you’re eating differently, you can’t help but be conscious about yourself because you don’t normally act that way, and that might be why we are embarrassed or hesitant to do the experiment even in establishments like Jollibee.

6.      Other observations and analysis that you may have on the activity and on deviance in general.
-          People become deviants as others define them that way.
-          Eating with one’s hands and not exercising “proper” eating etiquette may be classified as deviant from the perspective of Kenny Roger’s staff and clientele, yet are openly welcomed or not noticed at all in Jollibee. 


PHOTOS

  

No comments:

Post a Comment